New or Reboot?


In 2020, we’ve added many words to our daily vocabulary. Among them are: pandemic, novel, unprecedented. Have this year’s events really been without precedent, though, or is that simply what we’ve been told?

What year is this?
If you guessed 2003, you’d be correct. But doesn’t it all feel like deja vu? Especially this part: “Chinese authorities mounted an elaborate campaign to keep the virus outbreak secret late in 2002, but by March 2003 the situation was out of control.
Definitely deja vu. Thanks for the time capsule, Time magazine.
And here we see a very familiar name. Anthony Fauci had a front row seat when SARS-1 came to town. So in 2020, why did Fauci act like he’d never seen anything like SARS-CoV-2? Even the name of the 2020 virus is the equivalent of “SARS, Jr.” Yet he and the media dutifully repeated “novel coronavirus” over and over, insisting SARS-CoV-2 was completely different from SARS-CoV-1. Look at the origin of the virus and those symptoms. How different is it, really?

In the aftermath of SARS-1, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diligently researched treatments. One group of scientists published their findings in 2005. See and download their work as a PDF from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) here. You may be surprised at what they learned.

We highlighted the conclusion which says: “Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection.

Do you remember chloroquine or its related form, hydroxychloroquine, being mentioned in the news over the Spring and Summer? Was the coverage positive or negative? This research didn’t come from some rogue, sketchy outfit. It was done by the nation’s premiere health agency in response to a pandemic with no known treatments, and it came to a favorable conclusion about a particular drug. Now that we know Fauci was present for the first rodeo with SARS-1 and has had this information for 15 years, we have questions.

  1. Why did the neither the NIH or the CDC develop protocols for deploying the cheap, readily available drug in an emergency situation?
  2. Why was the drug publicly denounced and also subjected to sham “studies” to further discredit it?
  3. Why was it so important to maintain a “no treatment, absolutely lethal” aura around SARS-CoV-2?
  4. Who will be held responsible for withholding potentially lifesaving treatment from the public?
  5. Why does anyone still listen to Fauci?

One thought on “New or Reboot?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s